Sunday, December 7, 2025 AD / Jumada al-Thani 16, 1447 AH
Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani
 New question: I have been working for many years in the governmental system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Considering the disregard for justice and the blatant acts of oppression committed against the rights of people in these institutions, is there any justification for continuing to work in this system? Click here to read the answer. New saying: A significantly important and enlightening saying from His Eminence about the condition for the Mahdi’s advent. Click here to read it. New critique: Please mention the name of the university or religious school from which His Eminence Khorasani has graduated; because no matter how much I searched, I did not find his name nor his fame as a famous writer, researcher, or religious man in Afghanistan. Click here to read the response. Visit home to read the most important contents of the website. New letter: An excerpt from His Eminence’s letter to one of his companions, in which he advises him and frightens him from Allah. Click here to read it. New lesson: Lessons from His Eminence on the fact that the Earth is never without a man knowledgeable in the entire religion, whom Allah has appointed as a caliph, Imam, and guide on it by His command; Authentic Hadiths from the Prophet about it; Hadith No. 22. Click here to read it. New remark: The remark “Inverted era” by “Elias Hakimi” has been published. Click here to read it. New video: A new video with the subject “The Call of Return to Allah” has been published. Click here to watch it. Visit home to read the most important contents of the website.
loading

to the extent that the culture governing the world of disbelief today—especially in Europe and North America—is a perfect example of modern barbarism, which has been shaped based on unbridled animal instincts and in contrast to natural and human laws, and is comparable to the savage culture of some primitive tribes. The mainstay of this culture—if it can be called a culture—is hedonism and permissiveness, which has been created from a fusion of Roman aristocracy and Greek anthropocentrism, and is in complete contrast to Eastern spirituality and Islamic rationality. Therefore, it is quite surprising and regrettable that some Muslims, disillusioned with their own heavenly culture that has all the necessary means for their development, have turned to following a group of scoundrels who—for example—consider abandoning chastity as a right and leaving protective jealousy as a duty, take pride in nothing but drinking, dancing, and nudity, and defend the rights of prostitutes and homosexuals while ignoring the rights of the hungry and the homeless. However, as a rule, primitive people like them should be educated and disciplined by Muslims to become free from animalism and learn the manners of human life!

[The History of Muslims Following Disbelievers]

Of course, the following of the statement and action of disbelievers has not been limited to a group of ignorant and subservient Muslims. Rather, a group of prominent and knowledgeable Muslims, especially in the early Islamic centuries, under the influence of the interest of the second and third caliphs and some Umayyad rulers in the People of the Book[1], also turned to utilizing the books of Jews and following their myths and teachings. Influenced by the propaganda of some of the Ahl al-Hadith, they claimed that this practice was legitimate and beneficial for knowing the beliefs and rulings of Islam. In this way, they paved the way for Jews and Muslims close to them to influence the beliefs and deeds of Muslims, and tainted Islamic politics and culture with Jewish politics and culture.

↑[1] . It is no secret that some of the Umayyad rulers were inclined toward the People of the Book. As for the inclination of Umar and Uthman toward them, it is attested to by many reports indicating that they would refer to them, ask them questions, and rely on their statements. For example, it has been narrated that Umar used to sit with Ka‘b al-Ahbar and seek knowledge from him (see Hilyat al-Awliya’ Wa Tabaqat al-Asfiya’ by Abu Nu‘aym al-Asbahani, vol. 5, pp. 365, 368, 371). Umar once said to him: “I adjure you by Allah, O Ka‘b! Do you find me to be a caliph or a king?” Ka‘b replied: “I bear witness that you are a caliph, not a king.” Umar asked: “And how is that?” He replied: “I find you mentioned in the Book of Allah.” Umar said: “Do you find me mentioned by name?” Ka‘b said: “No, but by your description.” (al-Fitan by ibn Hammad, vol. 1, pp. 101 and 102). It has been stated in another narration: “Umar sent to Ka‘b and said to him: ‘O Ka‘b! How do you find my description?’ He said: ‘A caliph, a horn of iron, who does not fear the blame of any blamer in the way of Allah; then a caliph whose people kill him unjustly; and thereafter tribulation will befall.’” (al-Ahad Wa al-Muthani by ibn Abi Asim, vol. 1, p. 126; al-Mu‘jam al-Kabir by al-Tabarani, vol. 1, p. 84)—and in another narration: “A man from the People of the Book came to Umar and said: ‘Peace be upon you, O King of the Arabs.’ So Umar said: ‘Do you find him described that way in your Book?! Do you not find the Prophet first, then the caliph, then Amir al-Mu’minin, and after that the kings?’ The man said: ‘Yes, yes.’” (al-Fitan by ibn Hammad, vol. 1, p. 103; Musannaf of ibn Abi Shaybah, vol. 7, p. 529)—and in another narration: “He asked one of the bishops who would succeed him. The bishop said: ‘A man who is not bad; he prefers his relatives.’ Umar then said: ‘May Allah have mercy on Uthman. May Allah have mercy on Uthman.’” (al-Fitan by Ibn Hammad, vol. 1, p. 126). It has also been narrated: “While Abu Dharr was at the gate of Uthman and was not permitted to enter, a man from Quraysh passed by him and said: ‘O Abu Dharr! Why are you sitting here?’ He replied: ‘These people refuse to allow me in.’ The man then went inside and said: ‘O Amir al-Mu’minin! Why is Abu Dharr at the gate and not permitted to enter?’ Uthman then ordered that he be allowed in. He came and sat beside the people while the inheritance of Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf was being distributed. Uthman said to Ka‘b al-Ahbar, while seeking his opinion: ‘O Abu Ishaq! Tell me, if Zakat is paid on wealth, should the owner be concerned about any liability for it?’ He said: ‘No.’ Abu Dharr then stood up, holding his staff, and struck it between Ka‘b’s ears. Then he said: ‘O son of the Jewish woman! Do you claim that nothing is due from his wealth except Zakat, while Allah Almighty says: ﴿وَيُؤْثِرُونَ عَلَى أَنْفُسِهِمْ وَلَوْ كَانَ بِهِمْ خَصَاصَةٌ [“They prefer (others) over themselves, even though they are in need of it.” (Al-Hashr/9)]?’ Uthman then said to the man from Quraysh: ‘We dislike permitting Abu Dharr because of what you saw.’” (al-Amwal by ibn Zanjawayh, vol. 2, p. 788)—and it has been narrated: “One day, Uthman said: ‘Is it permissible for the Imam to take from the public wealth and then, when he becomes solvent, repay it?’ Ka‘b replied: ‘There is nothing wrong with that.’ Abu Dharr then said: ‘O son of the Jewish parents! Are you teaching us our religion?!’—and in another narration, he said: ‘Since when have you become the one to give a fatwa, O son of the Jewish woman?!’—Uthman then said: ‘How much you trouble me, and how obsessed you are with my companions! Go back to where you belong.’” (Ansab al-Ashraf by al-Baladhuri, vol. 5, p. 542; al-Awa’il by al-Askari, p. 192). Uthman then banished him to al-Sham, and later to al-Rabdah! Thus, Ka‘b al-Ahbar was held in high regard during his time, being consulted and issuing fatwas, while Abu Dharr was an outcast and denied any permission!