Thursday, September 11, 2025 AD / Rabi’ al-Awwal 18, 1447 AH
Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani
 New question: Please explain the identifying traits and authentic signs of Imam Mahdi. Click here to read the answer. New saying: A significantly important and enlightening saying from His Eminence about the condition for the Mahdi’s advent. Click here to read it. New critique: Please mention the name of the university or religious school from which His Eminence Khorasani has graduated; because no matter how much I searched, I did not find his name nor his fame as a famous writer, researcher, or religious man in Afghanistan. Click here to read the response. Visit home to read the most important contents of the website. New letter: An excerpt from His Eminence’s letter to one of his companions, in which he advises him and frightens him from Allah. Click here to read it. New lesson: Lessons from His Eminence on the fact that the Earth is never without a man knowledgeable in the entire religion, whom Allah has appointed as a caliph, Imam, and guide on it by His command; Authentic Hadiths from the Prophet about it; Hadith No. 22. Click here to read it. New remark: The remark “Inverted era” by “Elias Hakimi” has been published. Click here to read it. New video: A new video with the subject “The Call of Return to Allah” has been published. Click here to watch it. Visit home to read the most important contents of the website.
loading

[Muslim Salafists]

Unfortunately, this approach, although many Muslim scholars in the early Islamic centuries did not agree with it[1], continued to survive and was passed down to the later Islamic generations under the support of Abbasid rule from the time of al-Mutawakkil (d. 247 AH) and also through the propaganda of a group of Hanbalis who considered themselves followers of the predecessors, until today it has reached a group known as “Salafiyyah.” These people, who consider themselves the heirs of “Ahl al-Hadith,” have inherited anti-rationalism from leaders such as ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728 AH), and with the guidance of figures such as ibn Abd al-Wahhab (d. 1206 AH), they have intensified it in two aspects: on the one hand, they not only do not consider the intellect to be proof in understanding practical narrations related to religious rulings, but they have also stopped using it in understanding theoretical narrations related to religious beliefs, coming to believe that religious beliefs do not need rational evidence and can be based on conjectural narrations; because, according to their supposition, conjectural narrations, whenever considered authentic by their self-made criteria, lead to certainty! Whereas this is contrary to the view of most scholars, and figures such as al-Shafi‘i (d. 204 AH) and the majority of the people of jurisprudence and reflection have emphasized that nothing leads to certainty except what is definitively issued by Allah without any dispute[2]. Rather, individuals such as al-Nawawi (d. 676 AH) have correctly asserted that such a belief is nothing but obstinacy against the perceptible[3]. On the other hand, they not only have not considered the conformity of narrations with the intellect to be necessary, but they have also not deemed their conformity with the Quran—which is the most authentic religious text and in accordance with the intellect—to be essential, so that in this way, no connection remains with the intellect, the intellectual, or the reasonable, and the way is paved for the spread of their superstitious and polytheistic beliefs.

↑[1] . As Abu Bakr al-Jassas (d. 370 AH) has said: “Among the reasons for rejecting ahad reports is their contradiction with the necessities of the rulings of the intellect; because the intellect serves as proof for Allah Almighty, and it is not permissible to alter what it indicates or necessitates. Any report that a rational proof contradicts with it is invalid and unacceptable, and the rational proof remains in force and valid, unless the report is susceptible to an interpretation that the rulings of the intellect do not contradict with it, in which case it is interpreted accordingly.” (Al-Fusul Fi al-Usul by al-Jassas, vol. 3, p. 121) Abd al-Qahir al-Baghdadi (d. 429 AH) has said regarding the principles that the Sunnis have agreed upon: “As for ahad reports, when their chains of narrators are authentic and their texts are not impossible according to the intellect, it is obligatory to act upon them without knowledge.” (Al-Farq Bayn al-Firaq by Abd al-Qahir al-Baghdadi, p. 312) Al-Mawardi (d. 450 AH) has said regarding ahad reports: “If their acceptability is established, acting upon what they contain is obligatory as long as the intellect does not prohibit it.” (Al-Hawi al-Kabir by al-Mawardi, vol. 16, p. 87) Al-Khatib Al-Baghdadi (d. 463 AH) has said: “When a reliable and trustworthy narrator narrates a report with a connected chain of narrators, it can be refuted for several reasons, one of which is that it contradicts rational necessities; thus, its falsity becomes known, since Sharia only affirms what the intellect allows. As for what contradicts the intellect, it is not affirmed.” (Al-Faqih Wa al-Mutifaqqih by al-Khatib al-Baghdadi, vol. 1, p. 354) He has also said: “A wahid report is not accepted if it contradicts a ruling of the intellect.” (Al-Kifayah Fi Ilm al-Riwayah by al-Khatib al-Baghdadi, p. 432) Abu Hamid al-Ghazali (d. 505 AH) has said: “Whatever the intellect indicates in favor of a particular side, there is no room for contradiction in it; because rational reasons cannot be abrogated or self-contradicted. Therefore, if there is textual evidence that goes against the intellect, either it is not mutawatir, so it is known to be unauthentic, or it is mutawatir, in which case it must be interpreted in a way that does not contradict the intellect. It is impossible for a mutawatir text to contradict rational reasons without the possibility of error or interpretation; because rational reasons do not admit of abrogation and falsity.” (Al-Mustasfa by al-Ghazali, p. 252) Abu al-Khattab al-Kalwadhani (d. 510 AH) has said regarding what is used to refute a report: “Among them is that it contradicts what the intellect requires. Whenever a report comes in this manner and we cannot interpret it except through a far-fetched and strained interpretation, it is not permissible for us to judge that the Prophet ﷺ said it; because if strained interpretation were permissible alongside contradiction, then contradiction in speech would be invalidated. Unless we say that the Prophet ﷺ narrated it from a people in a manner of repudiation and denial against them, and he mentioned something additional that was hidden from the narrator, which would take the report out of the realm of contradiction. Only those reports that reason does not find contradictory are accepted.” (Al-Tamhid Fi Usul al-Fiqh by al-Kalwadhani, vol. 3, p. 147) Abu al-Wafa’ ibn Aqil (d. 513 AH) has said: “The evidence of the intellect specifies the evidence of the Book and the reports.” (Al-Wadih Fi Usul al-Fiqh by Abu al-Wafa’ ibn Aqil, vol. 3, p. 393) Al-Samarqandi (d. 539 AH) has said regarding the conditions of a wahid report: “Among them is that it should align with rational evidence; thus, if it contradicts (the intellect), it is not accepted, such as the reports that have been transmitted regarding tashbih (comparing Allah to created beings) and similar matters; because the intellect is one of the proofs of Allah Almighty, and He is Wise and All-Knowing; therefore, it is not permissible for His proofs to contradict each other. And auditory evidence may involve metaphor, implication, and allusion, and the like; thus, it is obligatory to interpret the reports in accordance with the intellect.” (Mizan al-Usul Fi Nata’ij al-Uqul by al-Samarkandi, vol. 1, p. 433)
↑[2] . See al-Tamhid by ibn Abd al-Barr, vol. 1, p. 7.
↑[3] . See Sharh Sahih Muslim by al-Nawawi, vol. 1, p. 132.