Monday, Fabruary 2, 2026 AD / Sha’ban 14, 1447 AH
Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani
 New question: I have been working for many years in the governmental system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Considering the disregard for justice and the blatant acts of oppression committed against the rights of people in these institutions, is there any justification for continuing to work in this system? Click here to read the answer. New saying: A significantly important and enlightening saying from His Eminence about the condition for the Mahdi’s advent. Click here to read it. New critique: Please mention the name of the university or religious school from which His Eminence Khorasani has graduated; because no matter how much I searched, I did not find his name nor his fame as a famous writer, researcher, or religious man in Afghanistan. Click here to read the response. Visit home to read the most important contents of the website. New letter: An excerpt from His Eminence’s letter to one of his companions, in which he advises him and frightens him from Allah. Click here to read it. New lesson: Lessons from His Eminence on the fact that the Earth is never without a man knowledgeable in the entire religion, whom Allah has appointed as a caliph, Imam, and guide on it by His command; Authentic Hadiths from the Prophet about it; Hadith No. 22. Click here to read it. New remark: The remark “Inverted era” by “Elias Hakimi” has been published. Click here to read it. New video: A new video with the subject “The Call of Return to Allah” has been published. Click here to watch it. Visit home to read the most important contents of the website.
loading

because the most well-known narrations that attempt to specify the Quran do not possess the widely transmitted status and clarity of the Quran, and therefore lack the authority to do so; considering that, in cases of conflict, a weaker narration is not given precedence over a stronger one—and the Sunnah is the weaker narration while the Quran is the stronger one. From here, it is understood that the function of the Sunnah of the Prophet is not to abrogate or specify the Quran, but rather to explain it by stating the subjects and details of its rulings, which does not necessitate abrogating or specifying it; as Allah Almighty has said: ﴿وَأَنْزَلْنَا إِلَيْكَ الذِّكْرَ لِتُبَيِّنَ لِلنَّاسِ مَا نُزِّلَ إِلَيْهِمْ وَلَعَلَّهُمْ يَتَفَكَّرُونَ[1]; “And We sent down the Quran to you so that you explain to the people what has been sent down to them, and that they may reflect.” He has not said: “So that you abrogate or specify for them,” but rather: “So that you explain to them”—such as stating the rak‘ats and manner of prayer, the objects and amount of Zakat, the conditions and rituals of Hajj, and the number and examples of those in authority. It is clear that none of these cases is regarded as abrogating or specifying the Quran[2].

[The Impossibility of Generalizing the Quran by the Sunnah of the Prophet]

Furthermore, from the impossibility of specifying the Quran with the Sunnah of the Prophet, the impossibility of generalizing it by his Sunnah becomes clear. This is because generalizing a ruling is a form of abrogating and specifying it, since it abrogates and specifies its restriction to its subject[3]—such as generalizing the forbidden foods in the Quran to many other foods, despite its explicit restriction; as Allah Almighty has said: ﴿قُلْ لَا أَجِدُ فِي مَا أُوحِيَ إِلَيَّ مُحَرَّمًا عَلَى طَاعِمٍ يَطْعَمُهُ إِلَّا أَنْ يَكُونَ مَيْتَةً أَوْ دَمًا مَسْفُوحًا أَوْ لَحْمَ خِنْزِيرٍ فَإِنَّهُ رِجْسٌ أَوْ فِسْقًا أُهِلَّ لِغَيْرِ اللَّهِ بِهِ[4]; “Say: ‘In what has been revealed to me, I do not find anything forbidden to one who would eat it, unless it is carrion, spilled blood, the flesh of swine—which is unclean—or a sinful offering in the name of other than Allah.’”

↑[1] . An-Nahl/ 44
↑[2] . Likewise, al-Shafi‘i has said in his Tafsir (vol. 1, p. 218): “The Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah stands alongside the Book of Allah in the position of clarifying Allah’s intent concerning what He has made obligatory—clarifying what He has intended by what He has revealed in general terms, and what He has revealed as obligation, etiquette, permission, and guidance. Nothing in the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah ever contradicts the Book of Allah in any circumstance, for Allah has informed His creation that His Messenger guides to a straight path—the path of Allah; nor does any of the ways of the Messenger of Allah abrogate the Book of Allah, for Allah has informed His creation that the Quran is abrogated only by a (verse of the) Quran like it, and the Sunnah follows the Quran. I have summarized here, from the clarification of the Sunnah in relation to the Book of Allah, some of what came to my mind that points toward similar meanings, InShaAllah. Allah has said: ﴿إِنَّ الصَّلَاةَ كَانَتْ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ كِتَابًا مَوْقُوتًا [‘Indeed, prayer is a prescribed obligation upon the believers at specific times’ (Al-Nisa/ 103)]. The Messenger of Allah then clarified the number of prayers, their specific times, and how they are to be performed, and he clarified that prayer is required of the general public—the free and the enslaved, men and women—except for menstruating women. Thus, he made clear from it the meanings that I have described.” Also, Abdullah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal has said in Masa’il Ahmad (p. 438): “I asked my father: ‘What do you say about the view that the Sunnah overrules the Book?’ He said: ‘Some people have said this, including Makhul and al-Zuhri.’ I said: ‘So what do you say?’ He said: ‘I say that the Sunnah points to the meaning of the Book,’” and al-Marwazi has narrated in al-Sunnah (p. 35) from a group of jurists: “It clarifies the particular and general aspects of the Quran, and it does not abrogate it, for the Sunnah does not abrogate the Quran. Rather, it clarifies its particular and general aspects and explains what is concise and what is ambiguous within it,” and Bakr ibn al-Ala’ has said in Ahkam al-Quran (p. 1356): “The Sunnah may explain what is obscure in the Quran, but it does not abrogate it.”
↑[3] . This is the view of Abu Hanifa and his companions; as al-Jassas (d. 370 AH) has stated in al-Fusul (vol. 1, p. 227): “An addition to the text entails abrogation; therefore, no addition to it is permissible except by that through which its abrogation would be permissible. This is also what our shaikh Abu al-Hasan used to say regarding this matter,” and al-Quduri (d. 428 AH) has stated in al-Tajrid (vol. 11, p. 5805): “An addition to the text, in our view, is abrogation, and it is not established except by that through which the Quran may be abrogated,” and al-Sarakhsi (d. 483 AH) has stated in his Usul (vol. 1, p. 292): “An addition to the text is abrogation, and the abrogation of that which yields certain knowledge is not established except by that which yields certain knowledge.” Some of the Mu‘tazilah have also said: “An addition to the text conveys the meaning of abrogation, because the meaning of abrogation is removal, and every addition removes one of the rulings; for it is either an addition in obligation, recommendation, permissibility, or prohibition” (al-Mu‘tamad Fi Usul al-Fiqh by Abu al-Husain al-Basri, vol. 1, p. 410).
↑[4] . Al-An‘am/ 145