Sunday, Fabruary 1, 2026 AD / Sha’ban 13, 1447 AH
Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani
 New question: I have been working for many years in the governmental system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Considering the disregard for justice and the blatant acts of oppression committed against the rights of people in these institutions, is there any justification for continuing to work in this system? Click here to read the answer. New saying: A significantly important and enlightening saying from His Eminence about the condition for the Mahdi’s advent. Click here to read it. New critique: Please mention the name of the university or religious school from which His Eminence Khorasani has graduated; because no matter how much I searched, I did not find his name nor his fame as a famous writer, researcher, or religious man in Afghanistan. Click here to read the response. Visit home to read the most important contents of the website. New letter: An excerpt from His Eminence’s letter to one of his companions, in which he advises him and frightens him from Allah. Click here to read it. New lesson: Lessons from His Eminence on the fact that the Earth is never without a man knowledgeable in the entire religion, whom Allah has appointed as a caliph, Imam, and guide on it by His command; Authentic Hadiths from the Prophet about it; Hadith No. 22. Click here to read it. New remark: The remark “Inverted era” by “Elias Hakimi” has been published. Click here to read it. New video: A new video with the subject “The Call of Return to Allah” has been published. Click here to watch it. Visit home to read the most important contents of the website.
loading

Therefore, thinking positively of such individuals—despite the many motives they had for concealing or distorting the truth—is not rational; rather, it is certainly an instance of foolishness[1]. Nevertheless, it appears that many Muslims are deliberately bent on this self-deception and believe that they are obligated to absolve the early generations of any error, even by resorting to lies. However, certainly, self-deception and lying have no place in Islam; as Allah Almighty has said: ﴿يُخَادِعُونَ اللَّهَ وَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَمَا يَخْدَعُونَ إِلَّا أَنْفُسَهُمْ وَمَا يَشْعُرُونَ[2]; “They seek to deceive Allah and those who believe, while they deceive none but themselves, and they do not realize,” and: ﴿إِنَّمَا يَفْتَرِي الْكَذِبَ الَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ بِآيَاتِ اللَّهِ ۖ وَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْكَاذِبُونَ[3]; “Only those who do not believe in Allah’s signs fabricate lies, and it is they who are the liars.” Rather, the utmost obligation that can be inferred from the intellect and Sharia in this regard is to show respect to the early Muslims, similar to the respect shown to one’s parents—not to absolve them of any error they committed. This is because paying attention to the errors of one’s parents does not necessitate disrespect toward them; rather, it is possible to criticize them for their errors without disrespecting them. An example is Ibrahim (peace be upon him), who criticized his father for his errors without disrespecting him; as Allah has spoken of him in order to teach Muslims, saying: ﴿إِذْ قَالَ لِأَبِيهِ يَا أَبَتِ لِمَ تَعْبُدُ مَا لَا يَسْمَعُ وَلَا يُبْصِرُ وَلَا يُغْنِي عَنْكَ شَيْئًا[4]; “When he said to his father: ‘O my father! Why do you worship something that does not hear, see, or benefit you in any way?!’” Similarly, showing respect to someone does not necessitate blind obedience to him. For this reason, Allah has permitted disobedience to one’s parents, but He has not permitted disrespect toward them, saying: ﴿وَإِنْ جَاهَدَاكَ عَلَى أَنْ تُشْرِكَ بِي مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ فَلَا تُطِعْهُمَا ۖ وَصَاحِبْهُمَا فِي الدُّنْيَا مَعْرُوفًا[5]; “And if they strive with you to make you associate with Me that of which you have no knowledge, do not obey them, and accompany them in the world with kindness.” From here, it is understood that one can show respect to the early Muslims while still pointing out their errors and refraining from following them in those errors.

In any case, whether we like it or not, whether we accept it or not, the current structure of the Islamic world and its existing alignments have been shaped more by the rule of the Umayyads and the political events of the early Islamic centuries than by Islam and its pure and perfect teachings. They have originated from the inclination of oppressive rulers, the passivity of Muslim scholars in the face of those rulers, and the void left by the Hashemites; to the extent that the current official understanding of Islam, especially in matters of belief, can be considered an Umayyad understanding of Islam—an understanding that, at least in matters concerning the structure and dynamics of political authority, stands fully exposed and overt[6].

↑[1] . Likewise, it has been narrated from Abu Wa’il Shaqiq ibn Salamah—one of the senior Tabi‘un—that he said: “Be wary of these people when it comes to your religion; for by Allah, they did not pass away until they had mixed things together.” Al-Ka‘bi (d. 319 AH) has narrated this in Qabul al-Akhbar (vol. 1, p. 37).
↑[2] . Al-Baqarah/ 9
↑[3] . An-Nahl/ 105
↑[4] . Maryam/ 42
↑[5] . Luqman/ 15
↑[6] . What His Eminence Mansoor (may Allah protect him) has pointed out regarding the great influence of the Umayyads on the culture of Muslims and their understanding of Islam is a regrettable reality supported by many attestations. In fact, it is something that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him and his family) and his Ahl al-Bayt foretold previously; as it has been authentically narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him and his family) said: «يُهْلِكُ أُمَّتِي هَذَا الْحَيُّ مِنْ قُرَيْشٍ» (Sahih of al-Bukhari, vol. 4, p. 199; Sahih of Muslim, vol. 8, p. 186); “This branch from Quraysh will bring ruin upon my Ummah,” and it is clear that their bringing ruin upon the Ummah means nothing other than this. It has also been narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him and his family) saw in a dream that the Umayyads would ascend his pulpit after him, leading people astray from the straight path and turning them backward—which also carries the same meaning (see Sunan of al-Tirmidhi, vol. 5, p. 444; Musnad of Abi Ya‘la, vol. 11, p. 348; Manaqib Amir al-Mu’minin by Muhammad ibn Sulayman al-Kufi, vol. 2, p. 171; Tafsir al-Ayyashi, vol. 2, p. 298; Tafsir ibn Abi Hatim, vol. 7, p. 2336; al-Mustadrak Ala al-Sahihain by al-Hakim, vol. 3, p. 186; Dala’il al-Nubuwwah by al-Bayhaqi, vol. 6, p. 509), and it has been narrated that he said: «إِنَّ أَوَّلَ مَنْ يُبَدِّلُ سُنَّتِي رَجُلٌ مِنْ بَنِي أُمَيَّةَ» (Musannaf of ibn Abi Shaybah, vol. 7, p. 260; al-Awa’il by ibn Abi Asim, p. 77); “Indeed, the first to change my Sunnah will be a man from the Banu Umayyah,” and he said: «إِذَا بَلَغَ بَنُو أُمَيَّةَ أَرْبَعِينَ رَجُلًا اتَّخَذُوا عِبَادَ اللَّهِ خَوَلًا، وَمَالَ اللَّهِ نِحَلًا، وَكِتَابَ اللَّهِ دَغَلًا» (al-Fitan by ibn Hammad, vol. 1, p. 130; Musnad al-Shamiyyin by al-Tabarani, vol. 2, p. 338; al-Mustadrak Ala al-Sahihain by al-Hakim, vol. 4, p. 525); “When the Banu Umayyah reach forty men, they will take the servants of Allah as slaves, the wealth of Allah as private property, and the Book of Allah as a means of deception.” For this reason, the most detested of all branches by him were the Banu Umayyah (see al-Fitan by ibn Hammad, vol. 1, p. 132; Musnad of Abi Ya‘la, vol. 13, p. 417; Musnad of al-Ruyani, vol. 1, p. 79; al-Mustadrak Ala al-Sahihain by al-Hakim, vol. 4, p. 528). Likewise, it has been narrated from Ali that he said: “Every nation has a blight, and the blight of this nation is the Banu Umayyah” (al-Fitan by ibn Hammad, vol. 1, p. 129), and he said: “Indeed, the most fearful of tribulations is, in my view, the tribulation of the Banu Umayyah for you, because it is a dark and murky tribulation. Its scheme is widespread, while its calamity strikes particular targets. By Allah, after me you will surely find the Banu Umayyah to be evil masters over you, like a vicious she-camel: it bites with its mouth, strikes with its hand, kicks with its foot, and withholds its milk. They will continue among you until they leave none of you except one who is useful to them or who causes them no harm. Their tribulation will come upon you ugly and dreadful, like fragments of the pre-Islamic era, in which there is no guiding landmark and no visible sign,” and he said: “By Allah, they will persist until they leave nothing that Allah has declared unlawful except that they deem it lawful, and no binding covenant except that they dissolve it; and until there remains no house of clay or hair except that their oppression enters it and the evil of their governance reaches it; and until two mourners rise and weep—one weeping for his religion and another weeping for his world; and until the support one of you receives from one of them becomes like the support a slave receives from his master: when present, he obeys him, and when absent, he backbites him” (see al-Fitan by ibn Hammad, vol. 1, p. 195; Musannaf of ibn Abi Shaybah, vol. 7, p. 528; Hadith ibn Dizil, pp. 82 and 84; al-Gharat by al-Thaqafi, vol. 1, p. 10; al-Mu‘jam al-Kabir by al-Tabarani, vol. 3, p. 102). It has also been narrated that when Husain was informed of the pledge of allegiance to Yazid, he said: “Indeed, we belong to Allah and to Him we shall return. Farewell to Islam, when the Ummah has been afflicted with a ruler like Yazid” (al-Futuh by ibn A‘tham, vol. 5, p. 17). His statement, “Farewell to Islam,” indicates the magnitude of the impact of the rule of Yazid and those like him from the Banu Umayyah upon Islam—to the extent that it was as if it brought about its death. Reflect, then.