Criticisms and investigations

7	Generals; Goals and conclusions of the book Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani, in his book, has not deprived any group, faction, sect and country of his criticisms, and has attacked them all from one side! Neither the Shiite, nor the Sunnite, nor the Salafi, nor the Sufi, nor the Ahl al-Hadith, nor the philosophers, nor the poets, nor the scholars, nor the guardianship of jurisprudent, nor democracy, nor the West, nor the ISIS, none of them is confirmed by him and none of them are considered in accordance with his so-called pure and complete Islam! Therefore, he has not left anyone for himself, and has displeased everyone! It is obvious that the Muslims of the world are either on that side or on this side and he has reacted against both sides! Therefore, there is no one left to support him! Everyone has become his enemy! Had he had a little politics, at least at the beginning of his movement, he would have kept at least one person for himself and would have not driven everyone away from himself! Anyway, now nobody considers him as a friend and everyone has taken a stand against him, and from Iran to Saudi Arabia and from ISIS to America, all are on one side and he is on another side! Therefore, it is clear that his work will not come to a conclusion and his failure is certain! He has no politics in my opinion.	Kianoush Qasempour	24/01/2015
6	Necessity and feasibility of return to Islam I read the book “Return to Islam” twice carefully. I did not understand it very well the first time, but I got it the second time. To be fair, it is a well-written and different book and I learnt a lot from it, especially from the parts it has explained cognition and its impediments, and the parts about the impediments to return to Islam, also my field of study is theology of religions and mysticism. In my opinion, these words they say that this book is deceptive and does not have reasoning and such, are absurd, because they themselves cannot write a book at this level, and if this book is deceptive, their books are blasphemies!! However, to be honest, I did not understand one part of the book and I have a problem and I think there is a contradiction. In one part, in the subject of “Performing some parts of Islam is contingent on performing the entire of it”, the author has said: “performing the Islamic Hadds[1] by those who do not know the entire laws of Islam and are not capable of administering all of them, is not permissible, without the legitimacy for non-performing the Islamic Hadds by them be permissible”! How is it possible that performing Islamic Hadds by them is not permissible and is also obligatory at the same time?!! This is contradiction and impossible! Of course, maybe I am wrong. Please guide me.	Mojtaba Salehi	22/01/2015
5	Necessity and feasibility of return to Islam I have a few questions from his honor: First, if the religion of Islam which currently exists, is not the very Islam at the time of the Prophet, then why does God say in Quran: «إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ لَحَافِظُونَ»[1]? Has God not been able to preserve His religion from distortion during 1400 years?? Second, if the religion of Islam which currently exists, is not the very Islam at the time of the Prophet, then what will happen to those many Allamah and great people whom even his honor [Allamah Khorasani] learned under their teachings?? Does it mean all of them have died on false religion? Even his honor’s [Allamah Khorasani’s] masters?? Thank you for answering my questions in the section for investigating criticisms of the website.	Morteza Savari	21/01/2015
4	Cognition of Islam; Sources of Islam; The book of God Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani does not consider conjecture as proof and believes only certainty is proof on one hand, and he considers the Book of God from the sources of Islam on the other hand, while according to the consensus, the book of God is conjectural and is not definite, and only the Sunnah[1] is definite. Therefore, if he believes that conjecture is not proof, then it is also not permissible to hold on to the book of God!	Abdullah Dastjerdi	19/01/2015
3	Generals; The author of the book According to our researches, “Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani” is a nickname!	Unknown	17/01/2015
2	Generals; The author of the book I did not know his honor before and even did not hear his name! I did not see any biography nor a picture of him on the internet too! It is not known at all if such a person exists! Assuming that he exists, it also is not known if he is Shia or Sunni! What kind of pure and complete Islam is this to which he invites and in which has disproved “absolute guardianship of Faghih” and has mentioned the names of Ahl al-Bayt without “peace be upon him”?! If he is Shia, he should have mentioned the names of Ahl al-Bayt with “peace be upon him” and if he is Sunni, at least should have mentioned their names with “Allah is pleased with him”!	Javad Ghasemzadeh	15/01/2015
1	Generals; The content of the book The book “Return to Islam” is full of claims and empty from reasons! I have never read a book that is to such an extent full of claims and empty from reasons!	Reza Moradi	06/01/2015

Go to code Go to number

First/Prev1Next/Last

Go to page