Monday January 18, 2021 AD Jumada al-thani 4, 1442 AH
English
فارسی العربية Точикӣ Русский
Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani
(19) Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani believes that the earth is never empty from the “Caliph of God” and his reason for this belief is the rational necessity of the existence of God’s Caliph on earth to teach the whole Islam and its implementation in a pure and complete way on one hand, and the word of God who has clearly said: “Undoubtedly I set a Caliph on the earth” on the other hand. (Section: Questions and answers)
loading
Criticisms & investigations
Go to
code
First/123/Last
Go to
page
Criticisms & investigations about
Code Number Code Subject & content Author Date Appendix
18 18
Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Sayings and writings
Thanks for your weighty website. I read the book of this great and unknown scholar entirety and read some parts of it twice. If I want to have a detailed description of it and not be accused of exaggeration, I must say that it was lower than the words of the Prophet and his family and higher than the words of others! In my opinion, such a book is not appreciated in our society so soon, and it will take a long time to be understood properly. Of course, this is also due to the weakness of your advertising; because a lot of people do not really know about this book yet and have not heard of it. You have to make the voice of this dear teacher of ours heard by people and inform them much more. I myself came across this book by chance, although I think it was God’s grace and was not accidental. Anyway, it is your duty to make people aware of the existence of this epistemological treasure in this time of ignorance and unawareness, and this amount of your propaganda is not enough at all. You have the most valuable product, but your marketing is weak. You have the best idea, but you cannot propound it well. This is very unfortunate!
A student 10/02/2015
17 17
Introductions; Knowledge; Duties and actions of scholars
In the book Return to Islam, he has mentioned Sayyid Jamal Asadabadi and has introduced him as a person who wrote a letter to the scholars of Islam as a reformer, but they refused to listen to fair words due to arrogance. Of course, there is no doubt that some scholars are arrogant and stingy, and there is no question that Sayyid Jamal has raised the right issues. But the point is that in some sources, Sayyid Jamal al-Din has been introduced as an agent of the British government and a freemason and in the service of British interests, and in fact in an Islamic and divine appearance, he has been in the service of evil interests. Also, the identity of this person is vague that some consider him a native of Hamedan and some a native of Afghanistan. Ismail Ra’in, in his famous book “Forgetting Home and Freemasonry in Iran”, writes: “Sayyid Jamal al-Din Asadabadi, known as Afghani, is one of the early freemasons of Iran who was a member of 9 masonic lodges. He was the head of the lodge and the visitor at the Malkolm forgetting home lodge...” It is also stated in some sources that he did not follow the duties of Ramadan and consumed cognac in Cairo and denied God...!
Muhammad Taqi 10/02/2015
16 16
Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Identity and attributes
Why does his honor call himself Khorasani? Email his reasons! From false claimants researcher!
Ali Asghar 09/02/2015
15 15
Introductions; Knowledge; Duties and actions of scholars
In the article written on the honorable website, you mentioned the infidel west and the like-that United States of America and the truth-oriented Islam several times, that most of these sentences have been heard for 35 years and have not had a good effect as much as a wheat seed. The biggest mistake in the existing world is to hand over the sovereignty of the countries to the religious and spiritual officials of the societies, which has left its undesirable effects on the political, economic, military, and social administration of the countries, and today we, 75 million Iranians, are immersed in swamp by the religious sovereignty in this world and are floundering. Never and never will the clergy and their entourage in the age of space and the Internet be able to lead a nation to all-round progress. We have heard from the past that the honor of any place depends on the person who sits in that place. The religion cannot lead mankind to the right and honesty in the position of lie and discrimination and extravagance of individuals and hundreds of other shortcomings in society. Until now, human history has not shown such a thing.
Mahmud Farzin 05/02/2015
14 14
Introductions; Knowledge; Impediments to gaining knowledge; Superstitions
If his honor is sincere in his intention, please find out the question which I am going to ask Wali al-’Asr (Imam Mahdi) by any means and answer it.
Baqer Esqandari 04/02/2015
13 13
Introductions; Proof; The book of God; Indication of some verses of Quran
I read this book. In fact, it was better and closer to the truth than the Shia thought, but Khorasani, like all Shias, is considered a polytheist and an infidel; because he has interpreted the verses of Quran according to his own opinion; because if you read before and after of many verses, which he has brought as reasons for his opinion, you understand that it has nothing to do with the context of the discussion. Of course, most of the verses and not all of them. For example, in the verse of Purification (Al-Tathir), God Almighty addresses exactly all the women of the Prophet, whereas Mansoor proves Wilayah (the guardianship) with it and makes it exclusive to Ali, Fatima and Hasanain (peace be upon them), although there is no doubt in their purity and they were righteous. Anyway, I’m waiting for answer to the criticism. I suggest that this author first researches to see who he worships; because by what you and the Shias say, you really surprise God.
Ahmad 30/01/2015
12 12
Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Identity and attributes
I read his book. Of course I read some parts a few times and I read some parts faster. To be fair, as much as I have knowledge of the religious sciences, I did not see any flaw in this book and almost all of it are truths that have been reminded. But the fundamental question is how can I make sure that he himself follows these truths practically and with certainty? (For example, whether he is not like me, the humble servant who may be a sinner and my faith may be incomplete). Considering that we still have not seen his performance with our own eyes and clear evidence. Of course, according to Holy Quran, we cannot deny everything that we have not seen, and believing in the unseen is one of the signs of faith (the first verses of blessed Surah Al-Baqarah). Perhaps one of our reasons is that he is the promised Khorasani and, according to the authoritative and Mutawatir statement of Imams of guidance, he, in addition to telling the truth, indeed follows it practically as well.
Ali Zaeim Zadeh 24/01/2015
11 11
Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Actions and aims
Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani, in his book, has not deprived any group, faction, sect and country of his criticisms, and has attacked them all from one side! Neither the Shiite, nor the Sunnite, nor the Salafi, nor the Sufi, nor the Ahl al-Hadith, nor the philosophers, nor the poets, nor the scholars, nor the guardianship of jurisprudent, nor democracy, nor the West, nor the ISIS, none of them is confirmed by him and none of them are considered in accordance with his so-called pure and complete Islam! Therefore, he has not left anyone for himself, and has displeased everyone! It is obvious that the Muslims of the world are either on that side or on this side and he has reacted against both sides! Therefore, there is no one left to support him! Everyone has become his enemy! Had he had a little politics, at least at the beginning of his movement, he would have kept at least one person for himself and would have not driven everyone away from himself! Anyway, now nobody considers him as a friend and everyone has taken a stand against him, and from Iran to Saudi Arabia and from ISIS to America, all are on one side and he is on another side! Therefore, it is clear that his work will not come to a conclusion and his failure is certain! He has no politics in my opinion.
Kianoush Qasempour 24/01/2015
10 10
Laws; Furu’ (ancillaries of the religion)
I read the book “Return to Islam” twice carefully. I did not understand it very well the first time, but I got it the second time. To be fair, it is a well-written and different book and I learnt a lot from it, especially from the parts it has explained cognition and its impediments, and the parts about the impediments to return to Islam, also my field of study is theology of religions and mysticism. In my opinion, these words they say that this book is deceptive and does not have reasoning and such, are absurd, because they themselves cannot write a book at this level, and if this book is deceptive, their books are blasphemies!! However, to be honest, I did not understand one part of the book and I have a problem and I think there is a contradiction. In one part, in the subject of “Performing some parts of Islam is contingent on performing the entire of it”, the author has said: “performing the Islamic Hadds[1] by those who do not know the entire laws of Islam and are not capable of administering all of them, is not permissible, without the legitimacy for non-performing the Islamic Hadds by them be permissible”! How is it possible that performing Islamic Hadds by them is not permissible and is also obligatory at the same time?!! This is contradiction and impossible! Of course, maybe I am wrong. Please guide me.
Mojtaba Salehi 22/01/2015
9 9
Beliefs; Cognition about faith and disbelief (Kufr); Religions, sects and factions
I have a question to ask his honor. The Prophet peace be upon him and his household said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one”. So, how does his honor claim all of them are not right except for one and that is the one he has brought now and has named it Hanif Islam?
Murteza Savaari 21/01/2015
8 8
Introductions; Proof; The book of God; Indication of some verses of Quran
I have a few questions from his honor: First, if the religion of Islam which currently exists, is not the very Islam at the time of the Prophet, then why does God say in Quran: ﴿إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ لَحَافِظُونَ﴾[1]? Has God not been able to preserve His religion from distortion during 1400 years?? Second, if the religion of Islam which currently exists, is not the very Islam at the time of the Prophet, then what will happen to those many Allamah and great people whom even his honor [Allamah Khorasani] learned under their teachings?? Does it mean all of them have died on false religion? Even his honor’s [Allamah Khorasani’s] masters?? Thank you for answering my questions in the section for investigating criticisms of the website.
Morteza Savari 21/01/2015
7 7
Introductions; Proof; The book of God; Virtues of Quran
Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani does not consider conjecture as proof and believes only certainty is proof on one hand, and he considers the Book of God from the sources of Islam on the other hand, while according to the consensus, the book of God is conjectural and is not definite, and only the Sunnah[1] is definite. Therefore, if he believes that conjecture is not proof, then it is also not permissible to hold on to the book of God!
Abdullah Dastjerdi 19/01/2015
6 6
Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Identity and attributes
According to our researches, “Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani” is a nickname!
Unknown 17/01/2015
5 5
Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Identity and attributes
I did not know his honor before and even did not hear his name! I did not see any biography nor a picture of him on the internet too! It is not known at all if such a person exists! Assuming that he exists, it also is not known if he is Shia or Sunni! What kind of pure and complete Islam is this to which he invites and in which has disproved “absolute guardianship of Faqih” and has mentioned the names of Ahl al-Bayt without “peace be upon him”?! If he is Shia, he should have mentioned the names of Ahl al-Bayt with “peace be upon him” and if he is Sunni, at least should have mentioned their names with “Allah is pleased with him”!
Javad Qasemzadeh 15/01/2015
4 4
Introductions; Knowledge; Duties and actions of scholars
Allamah Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani, who believes imitation of scholars is not enough, then what role or duty does he consider for them? Does he believe that Muslim scholars have no particular role and responsibility?!
Amir Mohammad 07/01/2015
Go to
code
First/123/Last
Go to
page
Download collection of criticisms & investigations
Criticisms; Return to Islam; Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani
Any usage and utilization from the content of this website provided that proper citation is made, is allowed.
×
Login
Forgot password?
Membership
Cancel
loading
×
Membership in newsletter
Please enter the security code.
Captcha
loading