Criticisms & investigations - page 2 | Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani

Writing criticism

* Please click here to write your criticism. But it is better to read other relevant criticisms and investigations. For this purpose, you can refer to the list of subjects or use the search feature.

Dear user! You can write down your academic criticisms about the works of allamah Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani in the following form and submit to us so that they are investigated academically.

Attention: Your name may be shown as the author of this criticism in the website.

Note: Since our response goes to your email address and is not posted in the website necessarily, it is important that you put your email address correctly.

Please note the following points:
1. Your criticism may have been already investigated in the website. Therefore, it is better to review relevant criticisms in the website or use the search bar before you write your criticism.
2. Usual time to investigate the criticisms is between 3 to 10 days.
3. It is better to avoid multiple and unrelated criticisms in one request. Because such criticisms will be investigated separately and probably will take longer than usual.

* Please enter the security code. Reload captcha

Subject of the criticisms

Introductions

Intellect

Knowledge

Necessity of and how to gaining knowledge (Ijtihad)

Impediments to gaining knowledge

Imitation

Superstitions

Duties and actions of scholars

Proof

The book of God

Virtues of Quran

Indication of some verses of Quran

The Caliph of God

The necessity and attributes of the Caliph of God

The proper way to know the Caliph of God (miracle and authentic text)

Narrations from the Caliphs of God (Wahid (solitary) and Mutawatir (recurrent))

Laws

Principles and rules

Furu’ (ancillaries of the religion)

Criticisms & investigations

First/Prev 1 2 3 Next/Last

Criticisms & investigations about

Code

Number

Code

Subject & content

Author

Date

Appendix

18	18	Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Sayings and writings Thanks for your weighty website. I read the book of this great and unknown scholar entirety and read some parts of it twice. If I want to have a detailed description of it and not be accused of exaggeration, I must say that it was lower than the words of the Prophet and his family and higher than the words of others! In my opinion, such a book is not appreciated in our society so soon, and it will take a long time to be understood properly. Of course, this is also due to the weakness of your advertising; because a lot of people do not really know about this book yet and have not heard of it. You have to make the voice of this dear teacher of ours heard by people and inform them much more. I myself came across this book by chance, although I think it was God’s grace and was not accidental. Anyway, it is your duty to make people aware of the existence of this epistemological treasure in this time of ignorance and unawareness, and this amount of your propaganda is not enough at all. You have the most valuable product, but your marketing is weak. You have the best idea, but you cannot propound it well. This is very unfortunate!	A student	10/02/2015
17	17	Introductions; Knowledge; Duties and actions of scholars In the book Return to Islam, he has mentioned Sayyid Jamal Asadabadi and has introduced him as a person who wrote a letter to the scholars of Islam as a reformer, but they refused to listen to fair words due to arrogance. Of course, there is no doubt that some scholars are arrogant and stingy, and there is no question that Sayyid Jamal has raised the right issues. But the point is that in some sources, Sayyid Jamal al-Din has been introduced as an agent of the British government and a freemason and in the service of British interests, and in fact in an Islamic and divine appearance, he has been in the service of evil interests. Also, the identity of this person is vague that some consider him a native of Hamedan and some a native of Afghanistan. Ismail Ra’in, in his famous book “Forgetting Home and Freemasonry in Iran”, writes: “Sayyid Jamal al-Din Asadabadi, known as Afghani, is one of the early freemasons of Iran who was a member of 9 masonic lodges. He was the head of the lodge and the visitor at the Malkolm forgetting home lodge...” It is also stated in some sources that he did not follow the duties of Ramadan and consumed cognac in Cairo and denied God...!	Muhammad Taqi	10/02/2015
16	16	Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Identity and attributes Why does his honor call himself Khorasani? Email his reasons! From false claimants researcher!	Ali Asghar	09/02/2015
15	15	Introductions; Knowledge; Duties and actions of scholars In the article written on the honorable website, you mentioned the infidel west and the like-that United States of America and the truth-oriented Islam several times, that most of these sentences have been heard for 35 years and have not had a good effect as much as a wheat seed. The biggest mistake in the existing world is to hand over the sovereignty of the countries to the religious and spiritual officials of the societies, which has left its undesirable effects on the political, economic, military, and social administration of the countries, and today we, 75 million Iranians, are immersed in swamp by the religious sovereignty in this world and are floundering. Never and never will the clergy and their entourage in the age of space and the Internet be able to lead a nation to all-round progress. We have heard from the past that the honor of any place depends on the person who sits in that place. The religion cannot lead mankind to the right and honesty in the position of lie and discrimination and extravagance of individuals and hundreds of other shortcomings in society. Until now, human history has not shown such a thing.	Mahmud Farzin	05/02/2015
14	14	Introductions; Knowledge; Impediments to gaining knowledge; Superstitions If his honor is sincere in his intention, please find out the question which I am going to ask Wali al-’Asr (Imam Mahdi) by any means and answer it.	Baqer Esqandari	04/02/2015
13	13	Introductions; Proof; The book of God; Indication of some verses of Quran I read this book. In fact, it was better and closer to the truth than the Shia thought, but Khorasani, like all Shias, is considered a polytheist and an infidel; because he has interpreted the verses of Quran according to his own opinion; because if you read before and after of many verses, which he has brought as reasons for his opinion, you understand that it has nothing to do with the context of the discussion. Of course, most of the verses and not all of them. For example, in the verse of Purification (Al-Tathir), God Almighty addresses exactly all the women of the Prophet, whereas Mansoor proves Wilayah (the guardianship) with it and makes it exclusive to Ali, Fatima and Hasanain (peace be upon them), although there is no doubt in their purity and they were righteous. Anyway, I’m waiting for answer to the criticism. I suggest that this author first researches to see who he worships; because by what you and the Shias say, you really surprise God.	Ahmad	30/01/2015
12	12	Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Identity and attributes I read his book. Of course I read some parts a few times and I read some parts faster. To be fair, as much as I have knowledge of the religious sciences, I did not see any flaw in this book and almost all of it are truths that have been reminded. But the fundamental question is how can I make sure that he himself follows these truths practically and with certainty? (For example, whether he is not like me, the humble servant who may be a sinner and my faith may be incomplete). Considering that we still have not seen his performance with our own eyes and clear evidence. Of course, according to Holy Quran, we cannot deny everything that we have not seen, and believing in the unseen is one of the signs of faith (the first verses of blessed Surah Al-Baqarah). Perhaps one of our reasons is that he is the promised Khorasani and, according to the authoritative and Mutawatir statement of Imams of guidance, he, in addition to telling the truth, indeed follows it practically as well.	Ali Zaeim Zadeh	24/01/2015
11	11	Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Actions and aims Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani, in his book, has not deprived any group, faction, sect and country of his criticisms, and has attacked them all from one side! Neither the Shiite, nor the Sunnite, nor the Salafi, nor the Sufi, nor the Ahl al-Hadith, nor the philosophers, nor the poets, nor the scholars, nor the guardianship of jurisprudent, nor democracy, nor the West, nor the ISIS, none of them is confirmed by him and none of them are considered in accordance with his so-called pure and complete Islam! Therefore, he has not left anyone for himself, and has displeased everyone! It is obvious that the Muslims of the world are either on that side or on this side and he has reacted against both sides! Therefore, there is no one left to support him! Everyone has become his enemy! Had he had a little politics, at least at the beginning of his movement, he would have kept at least one person for himself and would have not driven everyone away from himself! Anyway, now nobody considers him as a friend and everyone has taken a stand against him, and from Iran to Saudi Arabia and from ISIS to America, all are on one side and he is on another side! Therefore, it is clear that his work will not come to a conclusion and his failure is certain! He has no politics in my opinion.	Kianoush Qasempour	24/01/2015
10	10	Laws; Furu’ (ancillaries of the religion) I read the book “Return to Islam” twice carefully. I did not understand it very well the first time, but I got it the second time. To be fair, it is a well-written and different book and I learnt a lot from it, especially from the parts it has explained cognition and its impediments, and the parts about the impediments to return to Islam, also my field of study is theology of religions and mysticism. In my opinion, these words they say that this book is deceptive and does not have reasoning and such, are absurd, because they themselves cannot write a book at this level, and if this book is deceptive, their books are blasphemies!! However, to be honest, I did not understand one part of the book and I have a problem and I think there is a contradiction. In one part, in the subject of “Performing some parts of Islam is contingent on performing the entire of it”, the author has said: “performing the Islamic Hadds[1] by those who do not know the entire laws of Islam and are not capable of administering all of them, is not permissible, without the legitimacy for non-performing the Islamic Hadds by them be permissible”! How is it possible that performing Islamic Hadds by them is not permissible and is also obligatory at the same time?!! This is contradiction and impossible! Of course, maybe I am wrong. Please guide me.	Mojtaba Salehi	22/01/2015
9	9	Beliefs; Cognition about faith and disbelief (Kufr); Religions, sects and factions I have a question to ask his honor. The Prophet peace be upon him and his household said: “My ummah will divide into 73 sects, all of them will be in the Fire except for one”. So, how does his honor claim all of them are not right except for one and that is the one he has brought now and has named it Hanif Islam?	Murteza Savaari	21/01/2015
8	8	Introductions; Proof; The book of God; Indication of some verses of Quran I have a few questions from his honor: First, if the religion of Islam which currently exists, is not the very Islam at the time of the Prophet, then why does God say in Quran: «إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ لَحَافِظُونَ»[1]? Has God not been able to preserve His religion from distortion during 1400 years?? Second, if the religion of Islam which currently exists, is not the very Islam at the time of the Prophet, then what will happen to those many Allamah and great people whom even his honor [Allamah Khorasani] learned under their teachings?? Does it mean all of them have died on false religion? Even his honor’s [Allamah Khorasani’s] masters?? Thank you for answering my questions in the section for investigating criticisms of the website.	Morteza Savari	21/01/2015
7	7	Introductions; Proof; The book of God; Virtues of Quran Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani does not consider conjecture as proof and believes only certainty is proof on one hand, and he considers the Book of God from the sources of Islam on the other hand, while according to the consensus, the book of God is conjectural and is not definite, and only the Sunnah[1] is definite. Therefore, if he believes that conjecture is not proof, then it is also not permissible to hold on to the book of God!	Abdullah Dastjerdi	19/01/2015
6	6	Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Identity and attributes According to our researches, “Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani” is a nickname!	Unknown	17/01/2015
5	5	Beliefs; Cognition about the Caliphs of God; Mahdi; Mansoor the preparer of the grounds for the advent of Mahdi; Identity and attributes I did not know his honor before and even did not hear his name! I did not see any biography nor a picture of him on the internet too! It is not known at all if such a person exists! Assuming that he exists, it also is not known if he is Shia or Sunni! What kind of pure and complete Islam is this to which he invites and in which has disproved “absolute guardianship of Faqih” and has mentioned the names of Ahl al-Bayt without “peace be upon him”?! If he is Shia, he should have mentioned the names of Ahl al-Bayt with “peace be upon him” and if he is Sunni, at least should have mentioned their names with “Allah is pleased with him”!	Javad Qasemzadeh	15/01/2015
4	4	Introductions; Knowledge; Duties and actions of scholars Allamah Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani, who believes imitation of scholars is not enough, then what role or duty does he consider for them? Does he believe that Muslim scholars have no particular role and responsibility?!	Amir Mohammad	07/01/2015

First/Prev 1 2 3 Next/Last

Download collection of criticisms & investigations

Criticisms; Return to Islam; Mansoor Hashemi Khorasani